Feedback by UserVoice

Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 51 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 75 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 84 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 107 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    love this idea as a deterrent to taking photos with a phone.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 129 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Having the AIP label as a condition for AAD conditional access rules would be fantastic. We use AAD CA rules a lot for external access and having this would allow an additional layer of control

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 147 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 162 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 170 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    The original feature of enabling labeling capabilities in Mac OS is currently available in public preview.
    This suggestion was forked from the original general request to release an AIP client for Mac. Applying protection for non-Office files is currently available using the Mac RMS Sharing app which is not deprecated (unlike the Windows release). Therefor the suggestion is standing in order to release an AIP Client for non-Office files in Mac and currently updated to “Under Review”

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 192 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    A lot of meeting notes and personal notes are kept in OneNote. If it's not protectable with anything besides a password, then it's not a viable option to recommend in the enterprise

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 221 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 847 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    31 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 170 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 405 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    30 comments  ·  General » Users, Photos, Contacts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is an ongoing problem due to group owners accounts being deleted. Either force the nomination of a new owner or pick an owner randomly from the list of members. Prevent ownerless groups

  15. 112 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 744 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our service is designed to protect the resources and ensure that certain users will not overwhelm it and cause latency for others. This limit is in place to protect against spike sending that we wish to discourage. As such, we have no plans to change the limit for regular mailboxes.

    Where possible, we encourage customers who have these requirements to seek solutions that do not send emails all at once, can make use of DLs, or use services like Dynamics or third-party services to send large volumes of emails to customers or student and parents.

    However, we are thinking about alternatives we can provide to solve this issue of higher sending for automated email scenarios to address this customer need.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We have processes which use macros to trigger emails from outlook for initiation and management of tasks and sometimes given the scale, they can send over 30 messages/minute. This wasn't a problem in the on-premise Exchange days but now it's become a serious issue. I'd love to see a mailbox level setting for higher limits or even a one time change via working with support.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base