Feedback by UserVoice

Jesse Hernandez

My feedback

  1. 120 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  2. 3,597 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 
  3. 165 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. 152 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 403 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thanks for taking the time to provide this feedback. We’ve updated the TechNet documentation (https://technet.microsoft.com/library/mt842508(v=exchg.150).aspx) to clear up confusion around which authentication type and protocol combinations are supported in CARs. Expanding support for more combinations could prevent bad actors with valid credentials from accessing mailbox content, but it wouldn’t help with scenarios like password spray attacks or malicious lockout attempts because CARs are evaluated post-authentication. There’s work underway on a solution that covers a broader array of basic authentication scenarios – we’ll share more details as soon as possible. In the interim, this blogpost (https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2018/03/05/azure-ad-and-adfs-best-practices-defending-against-password-spray-attacks/) outlines the recommended approach for forcing multi-factor authentication when using AAD and ADFS.

    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 
  6. 138 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 
  7. 3,682 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    200 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Azure Active Directory Conditional Access has functionality for “Countries/Regions” – see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/conditional-access/location-condition

    That said, the most effective protection you can have against password spray attacks is to enable MFA and disable basic authentication. If you cannot do this for your entire organization, then blocking user access to legacy protocols like POP, EWS, IMAP and SMTP is another step you can take. Exchange Online Client Access Rules can help you to further customize (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/clients-and-mobile-in-exchange-online/client-access-rules/client-access-rules). For additional recommendations, please see Office 365 Secure Score.

    That said, please know that we are listening to feedback and working on solutions to help make Office 365 users more secure. Thank you for the feedback.

    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 
  8. 84 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » SharePoint Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 
  9. 3,283 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    116 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 
  10. 221 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance » Malware  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 
  11. 180 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance » eDiscovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We now offer more simplified way to review content in Advanced eDiscovery. Please review documentation here:

    Review sets in Advanced eDiscovery (v2.0)

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/view-documents-in-review-set?view=o365-worldwide

    Note that the In-Place eDiscovery and Holds cmdlets in the EAC are now retired:

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/legacy-ediscovery-retirement?view=o365-worldwide

    We recommend considering the new review tool in Advanced eDiscovery.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jesse Hernandez commented  · 

    Doesn't make any sense why they don't bring over this extremely useful functionality over to the Securitity and Compliance Center since it is being depracated from the Exchange Admin Center in July.

    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,213 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    133 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Message Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesse Hernandez supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base