Feedback by UserVoice

Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 53 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    so my usecase is:
    Company allows its employees using the email account also for private use.
    so typically 1/3 of all employees receive email from gmail.com or outlook.com adresses which transport private messages. for privacy reasons (law) we want to be able to distinguish between company and personal emails. Typically gmail.com emails are not classified at all but should be classified as "private use".

    1) users applying the classification: all employees which are using the email account also for private use and dont want the company to interfere with those emails. Users NOT searching the classification (excluding them from compliance searches.... ) internal audit, ...
    2) at the current way we think no protection would be needed as a MUST just labeling BUT it would be nice (optional) if protection can be applied as well.
    3) no would not be a problem. they can again be manually classified as "personal"

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    For us it would be great that our employees can Label also incoming mails as private. Since such emails are typically not labeled before.

    Also incoming emails from externals should be able to be marked and labeled.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 157 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    The original feature of enabling labeling capabilities in Mac OS is currently available in public preview.
    This suggestion was forked from the original general request to release an AIP client for Mac. Applying protection for non-Office files is currently available using the Mac RMS Sharing app which is not deprecated (unlike the Windows release). Therefor the suggestion is standing in order to release an AIP Client for non-Office files in Mac and currently updated to “Under Review”

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I would not say remove is important for me but maybe rewriting. For many it could make sense also to express to externals what this means. Others might want to remove it completely.

  7. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 118 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 76 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) » OME  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 31 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 67 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 56 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    The All Authenticated users feature allows for tracking without protection. Of course, tracking without encryption is not possible since if it’s not encrypted no license is required for accessing the content and thus there can’t be tracking, but the feature currently in preview should meet the same need. I’m renaming the feature request to reflect this reality.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base