Feedback by UserVoice

Andrew Milford-Wood

My feedback

  1. 1,794 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    72 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Milford-Wood supported this idea  · 
  2. 3,977 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    245 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Milford-Wood commented  · 

    We really need this feature! I understand that groups are mainly for collaboration but every team in my organisation interacts with the outside world ('clients', 'service users') as a matter of course and needs to mark comms as 'work in progress', 'dealt with' or whatever.
    What's the point of groups otherwise?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Milford-Wood commented  · 

    This would be incredibly useful. The single thing putting me off groups. So fundamental - What's to think about?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Milford-Wood commented  · 

    We currently use user mailboxes for teams and I have been considering switching to groups. However this is the single reason why I won't - some of our teams get many, many emails.
    The lack of folder structure seems like a huge oversight.

    Andrew Milford-Wood supported this idea  · 
  3. 158 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Milford-Wood supported this idea  · 
  4. 9,712 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1045 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Milford-Wood supported this idea  · 
  5. 4,390 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    256 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Milford-Wood supported this idea  · 
  6. 709 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    44 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our service is designed to protect the resources and ensure that certain users will not overwhelm it and cause latency for others. This limit is in place to protect against spike sending that we wish to discourage. As such, we have no plans to change the limit for regular mailboxes.

    Where possible, we encourage customers who have these requirements to seek solutions that do not send emails all at once, can make use of DLs, or use services like Dynamics or third-party services to send large volumes of emails to customers or student and parents.

    However, we are thinking about alternatives we can provide to solve this issue of higher sending for automated email scenarios to address this customer need.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Milford-Wood commented  · 

    This is a real surprise and so unhelpful. We have a few mailing lists (with consent) of several hundred apiece. Not a big emailer outside of this. Should allow extra mails for nominated senders in our organisation, or a whitelist system for lists. The only solutions e.g. use mailchimp, are not practical for various reasons. Besides, we'd rather do everything with one product. Fix it, please!!!

    Andrew Milford-Wood supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base