Feedback by UserVoice

Raj

My feedback

  1. 4,245 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    181 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Raj commented  · 

    Use powershell to achieve this. Steps are here- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/howto-mfa-userstates#use-powershell
    Global Admin perms are not needed but you still need User Management Admin perms.

  2. 773 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    47 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our service is designed to protect the resources and ensure that certain users will not overwhelm it and cause latency for others. This limit is in place to protect against spike sending that we wish to discourage. As such, we have no plans to change the limit for regular mailboxes.

    Where possible, we encourage customers who have these requirements to seek solutions that do not send emails all at once, can make use of DLs, or use services like Dynamics or third-party services to send large volumes of emails to customers or student and parents.

    However, we are thinking about alternatives we can provide to solve this issue of higher sending for automated email scenarios to address this customer need.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Raj commented  · 

    Please refer to Ticket #:11251486. My user just send one email with 100 recipients and she got blocked. It has happened before and we keep unblocking her. There should be a White list for internal senders who need to send to large number of external users. We cannot create a DL as the recipients change.
    As far as 30 messages/min/sender it is upto the EXO mechanism to throttle and optimize the messages sent correct?

  3. 133 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Raj commented  · 

    Removing "-PurgeType SoftDelete does not work

    Raj supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base