Feedback by UserVoice

Vilius

My feedback

  1. 1,065 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    thinking about it  ·  17 comments  ·  Delve » Boards  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  2. 2,181 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    in the plans  ·  78 comments  ·  Delve » People Experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  3. 108 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delve » People Experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  4. 875 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    67 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Following up on the previous update, if a workload (such as Planner) is enabled for Outlook by default, we don’t plan on hiding those groups from the GAL. The only other scenario currently under consideration where we would hide groups by default is “Secret Groups”. “Secret Groups” would be hidden from everywhere unless you are a member. “Secret groups” is on the Microsoft 365 Groups backlog, but there is no delivery date available at this time.

    Vilius supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Vilius commented  · 

    @Vijay Nelson The is not need for secret groups. All Office 365 Groups created should hidden by default in GAL (Outlook). This includes both private and public groups. GAL is like an official address book for the employees and it should not be littered with user's tests, private mini groups, the groups which are mostly created temporary, like project groups, etc. etc. For example we are large enterprise and we have hundreds of groups like "admin-todolist@domain.onmicrosoft.com" . This group email has no value in the GAL.

    The best solution would be to allow users to unhide the group, but dedicated administrators should confirm this change. Also it would be great to have O365 Groups in separate address list in the GAL.

  5. 371 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  6. 91 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    The Junk Email Reporting Add-in is our current solution for Outlook users. You can get the download for it, and learn more here:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj723127(v=exchg.150).aspx
    We do absolutely triage these submissions and use them to improve EOP.

    If you aren’t using Outlook, simply create a new mail to junk [AT] office365.microsoft.com and attach the entire message, including headers (see https://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj723151(v=exchg.150).aspx). We are looking at better reporting options for Mac and mobile users. What might be helpful here is commenting with which applications you use most.

    Administrators can also now go to http://aka.ms/FixSpam and troubleshoot their users’ most persistent spam issues.

    If you continue having difficulties, we recommend a support ticket to investigate current samples. It is frequently the case that a simple configuration issue is to blame — and support can help you figure this out.

    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  7. 104 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Vilius supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base