Feedback by UserVoice

Wesley Kirkland

My feedback

  1. 80 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Wesley Kirkland supported this idea  · 
  2. 616 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    ATP does not consider mails from other Office 365 tenants, or even mailboxes inside of your tenant, as safe. The best way to put a stop to this is to follow the recommendations in SecureScore for your tenant; and report phishing mails to us promptly. Also, make sure that the sender is not allowed either by the tenant configuration or the user safelist.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wesley Kirkland commented  · 

    MS - Why would ATP not consider your internal tenant and other tenants. You're saying because they use an MS service you're safe and no bad actors can ever get through.

  3. 925 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    32 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wesley Kirkland supported this idea  · 
  4. 2,083 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wesley Kirkland commented  · 

    Why would you registrar your domain through O365? Why not use another registrar and DNS provider that supports DNSSEC?

  5. 4,083 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    171 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wesley Kirkland supported this idea  · 
  6. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wesley Kirkland commented  · 

    That's an arbitrary number, while I semi agree with MS's logic here they should observe the standard as described in detail here.

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32290167/what-is-the-maximum-length-of-a-dns-name/32294443

  7. 720 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    60 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wesley Kirkland supported this idea  · 
  8. 740 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    45 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our service is designed to protect the resources and ensure that certain users will not overwhelm it and cause latency for others. This limit is in place to protect against spike sending that we wish to discourage. As such, we have no plans to change the limit for regular mailboxes.

    Where possible, we encourage customers who have these requirements to seek solutions that do not send emails all at once, can make use of DLs, or use services like Dynamics or third-party services to send large volumes of emails to customers or student and parents.

    However, we are thinking about alternatives we can provide to solve this issue of higher sending for automated email scenarios to address this customer need.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wesley Kirkland commented  · 

    I think this limit should be lowered. O365 is not meant for transnational email and they have tons of limits built in for this. Use something like SendGrid, PostMark, Mandrill, or MailGun.

  9. 6,606 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    183 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    I’m pleased to report that the feature has been rolling out WW for the past few weeks. We are going to wait a few more weeks to make certain it has rolled out everywhere. We will then publish the instructions on how to enabled it for your organisations as it is turned off by default.

    Wesley Kirkland supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wesley Kirkland commented  · 

    While I don't personally use this, we have many GSuite tenants that we will be migrating and they hate that O365 doesn't support this.

    Our solution is scanning Gmail for Sieve addresses daily and logging them, and then we will either add them as O365 proxy addresses. Or use Mimecast to turn on sieve subaddressing for those domains and instruct the users we rewrite the email before it hits O365. This make it work but the user loses the sieve address that the originally used.

  10. 3,499 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    63 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wesley Kirkland supported this idea  · 
  11. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wesley Kirkland commented  · 

    What we did is just block the default domain

  12. 3,399 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Wesley Kirkland supported this idea  · 
  13. 63 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wesley Kirkland supported this idea  · 
  14. 229 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wesley Kirkland commented  · 

    I agree this should be consolidated, while many libraries will allow for more than 10. The standard is 10 or less, and string concatenation would be better.

Feedback and Knowledge Base