Feedback by UserVoice

Dan M

My feedback

  1. 927 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    32 comments  ·  Delve » People Experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,220 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    59 comments  ·  Delve » Delve for Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,872 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    in the plans  ·  68 comments  ·  Delve » People Experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M commented  · 

    Hey MSFT - please provide an update on this

    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  4. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M commented  · 

    Also missing the MCAS admin center and the WDATP admin center

  6. 6,039 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    160 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We announced at Ignite that we are actively working on bringing dynamic plus aliases to Office 365.
    To get around existing usage, the plan is for an opt-in setting. Our ETA is to have this available for all customers by the third quarter of 2020.
    I will keep you updated in Uservoice on our progress.

    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,604 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    thinking about it  ·  41 comments  ·  Office 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  8. 3,423 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    189 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Azure Active Directory Conditional Access has functionality for “Countries/Regions” – see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/conditional-access/location-condition

    That said, the most effective protection you can have against password spray attacks is to enable MFA and disable basic authentication. If you cannot do this for your entire organization, then blocking user access to legacy protocols like POP, EWS, IMAP and SMTP is another step you can take. Exchange Online Client Access Rules can help you to further customize (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/clients-and-mobile-in-exchange-online/client-access-rules/client-access-rules). For additional recommendations, please see Office 365 Secure Score.

    That said, please know that we are listening to feedback and working on solutions to help make Office 365 users more secure. Thank you for the feedback.

  9. 112 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » SharePoint Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your feedback! Your idea sounds interesting, but we need more information:

    We are certainly thinking about extensible user schema across Office365 suite, and trying to figure out which attribute mappings make sense. We’d love to know more about the scenario you have – Why did your customer chose to use AD custom attributes over User Profile attributes in SharePoint?

    Dan M commented  · 

    MSFT please provide an update on this. We can now sync custom attributes to AAD, but there is still no way to have this feed into the SPO UPS.

  10. 1,131 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  Office 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M commented  · 

    Any update from MSFT on this one?

    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  11. 288 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M commented  · 

    ClickOnce has to go away. Many enterprises block this. The installer also fails when the user does not have access to write to the their desktop, which many enterprises also restrict access to.

    Please make this like many of the other modern Microsoft PowerShell deployments. Make it just like the Azure AD one from a deployment perspective

    Dan M commented  · 

    MSFT needs to get consistent with all of the PowerShell modules for their cloud services. Look at the AzureAD module. This should be the standard in how it is delivered and how you connect. Be consistent in delivery and verb usage. The Exchange Online click-once is the worst. Skype for Business Online is the runner up.

    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  12. 143 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Dan M commented  · 

    So now that sensitivity tags are now in the SCC, my question is why on earth do DLP policies in SCC only allow you to create policy based on "retention" tags. Retention tags should have NOTHING to do with DLP.

  13. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M shared this idea  · 
  14. 865 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    28 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  15. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M commented  · 

    This now exists as "Dynamics 365 service administrator". #please-close

  16. 206 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  17. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General » Uncertain topic  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M shared this idea  · 
  18. 10,129 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    358 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan M supported this idea  · 
  19. 39 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Dan M commented  · 

    It would be nice if this was similar to transport rules in Exchange. For example, when user in group A tries to communicate with user in group B, drop the message and return a message to the user.

    Currently, there are no 3rd party solution providers that can do this either. Even if there were, the partner approach would not be ideal as it adds complexity and increases risk of system outages. Needs to be native in the platform.

    Dan M shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base