Feedback by UserVoice

Bernard Welmers

My feedback

  1. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  2. 41 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bernard Welmers commented  · 

    My HR and Payroll departments are not the most computer savey people but they would really be able to use this feature. I was also hoping it would be available in the tool bar of outlook so I could point them to it.

    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  3. 550 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  General » Users, Photos, Contacts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  4. 37 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bernard Welmers commented  · 

    I am likely going to turn off DLP at this point because I can not exclude our Accounts Payable/Receivable mailboxes. These people constantly get emails that include bank accounts and need to receive them as part of their role.

  5. 1,194 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    71 comments  ·  Delve  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  6. 2,044 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    in the plans  ·  73 comments  ·  Delve » People Experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  7. 985 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    34 comments  ·  Delve » People Experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  8. 729 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Delve » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your feedback! We’re reviewing your suggestion. Remember, the more votes a suggestion gets, the more likely it is that we’ll do it.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bernard Welmers commented  · 

    I really can't believe that O365 modern search can not find any list items. That is ridiculous.

    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  9. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  10. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bernard Welmers commented  · 

    You can set retention policies to apply to whole services. This should not have any limit on new mailboxes coming on line.

  11. 649 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bernard Welmers commented  · 

    This actually happens on the SharePoint side in general. I was unable to delete a number of sites that had no content due to the retention policies. I was even unable to delete lists/libraries due to the retention.

    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  12. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance » eDiscovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers shared this idea  · 
  13. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance » eDiscovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bernard Welmers commented  · 

    I agree there is little ability to allow current employees to search inactive user's mailboxes. The best that I have found is to create an E-Discovery case and allow people into that case but not the ability to change the case. Unfortunately I just found out that people with "Compliance Search" capabilities can still use the general search to search for other mailboxes. So unfortunately that is not an answer either.

    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  14. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  15. 284 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  16. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  17. 502 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,907 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    57 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  19. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance » eDiscovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
  20. 3,549 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    197 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Azure Active Directory Conditional Access has functionality for “Countries/Regions” – see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/conditional-access/location-condition

    That said, the most effective protection you can have against password spray attacks is to enable MFA and disable basic authentication. If you cannot do this for your entire organization, then blocking user access to legacy protocols like POP, EWS, IMAP and SMTP is another step you can take. Exchange Online Client Access Rules can help you to further customize (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/clients-and-mobile-in-exchange-online/client-access-rules/client-access-rules). For additional recommendations, please see Office 365 Secure Score.

    That said, please know that we are listening to feedback and working on solutions to help make Office 365 users more secure. Thank you for the feedback.

    Bernard Welmers supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base