Feedback by UserVoice

Bill Blais

My feedback

  1. 4,763 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    197 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Apps and App Launcher  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Thanks for the flag, Karl! Glad to see it's been revived.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Thanks, Ilija, for finding that reference! I suppose that explains it (depressingly), but it would be nice to have the admin response here at least match (even if it is a big thumbs down to users).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    I just tried looking for the Roadmap entry described in Barbara Feldon's "Working On It" comment, but it's not there anywhere. I see a few references to the app launcher, but none reference the kind of customization discussed here, that I can see. Am I missing something?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    As this is the only related thread with an official response to date, here are some related improvement suggestions below:

    Allow users more control over current 'required' tiles - https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/264636-general/suggestions/32195359-allow-better-customization-on-new-app-launcher-a

    Allow tenants to set up initial tiles -- https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/264636-general/suggestions/13875528-control-default-tiles-in-app-launcher

    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 
  2. 848 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    57 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    UPDATE: just found the Word-specific uservoice request for the same issue here:
    https://word.uservoice.com/forums/271331-word-for-the-web/suggestions/7309773-add-track-changes-to-word-online

    I am an 'First Release' user in my tenant and 2 weeks ago I stumbled across Track Changes functionality in the Review ribbon in Word Online while editing a doc with a coworker! And it worked as expected (color changes, strikethroughs, named edits, etc.)! I was thrilled! It wasn't available for any non-First Release users, but that was fine.

    Now, however, it's gone. I wish I'd taken a screenshot to prove my sanity, but I checked and our sysadmin hasn't changed any O365 settings. Anyone else experience this?

  3. 169 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  General » Users, Photos, Contacts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    This I think might be more what the original suggestion was describing: The 'Add New' button disables well before the 100 limit when using at least some Likert scale questions.

    A workaround is possible (the button re-enables after either deleting 'statements' in the likert scale(s) or creating single-entry likert scales first and then going back and adding 'statements' after all the other questions have been added), but it is VERY confusing.

    Our use case from this morning: A survey starting with 18 3-statement likert scale questions (counting as 72 questions). Only an additional 8 short text entry questions were able to be created (totalling only 80) prior to the 'Add New' button disabling on us. Deleting several of the 'statements' in the various likert questions re-enabled the button, allowing the creation of the required additional 11 questions (totalling 91). Once these additional questions were added, we were then able to go back and add the necessary statements back to the original likert questions we'd removed them from (because the final total was still under 100).

    Apart from the distinctly confusing experience in general, the above workaround also caused absolute havoc with the underlying Excel sheet (Form was connected to OneDrive, in this case). Because of the way Forms 'builds' the data output in Excel, the columns for the original deleted 'statements' were still present while the re-added 'statements' appeared at the end of the output making it near impossible to map the data. Duplicating the form eliminated the 'deleted' fields, but did not fix the rest of the ordering (in fact, it added more confusion, grouping some like-named fields together for no apparent reason).

    Would love for the Add New button to do the math properly and even a visual indicator that increments with each question so the creator/editor can see clearly what the current count status is.

  4. 3,229 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    504 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We see two patterns in this feedback thread and are addressing them now. The first pattern is that users want AutoSave OFF. The second pattern is that the Template scenarios are problematic with AutoSave.

    To address turning AutoSave OFF, we have implemented these capabilities:

    1. To avoid accidental edits by others, the owner of a file can set it to Always Open Read-Only. This can be done by setting the file to open in Read-Only Recommended (File > Info > Protect Document/ Workbook/ Presentation > Always Open in Read-Only) or by Sharing the file without allowing others to edit (File > Share > People with the link can edit > Uncheck the “Allow Editing” box).

    2. Users can turn AutoSave OFF for a file. While a document is open, clicking the AutoSave toggle turns AutoSave OFF for the current document for that user. The next time the same…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Agree with Gabriel Smoljár, particularly #2. No reason just opening a document should change the modified date. Very confusing.

  5. 1,474 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    66 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Apps and App Launcher  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Totally agree.

    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Is there really no official response to this yet (nearly a year and more than 800 votes later)? It seems like a no-brainer 'switch' to add, but maybe there's more to it (to play devil's advocate)? Either way, some response/explanation would be great.

  6. 220 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Totally agree! Even just the 3 apps was a huge user benefit. Now it's completely gone with no replacement or explanation, so now user's see it as a bug ("Hey! I lost my navbar! What did my IT team just do?")

    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 
  8. 678 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    76 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » Exchange Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 
    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 
  9. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Or at least allow users to disable it. See also this tech community thread about privacy issues:

    https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Office-365/New-App-Launcher-and-privacy/td-p/107579

    Yes, it's possible to manually remove individual items, but that feels like a really untenable option in real-world scenarios.

    Bill Blais shared this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bill Blais shared this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bill Blais shared this idea  · 
  12. 59 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    For what it's worth, I also found this related post which has the most votes and seems to be where the most feedback is:

    https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/273493-office-365-admin/suggestions/8544421-allow-the-admin-to-pin-custom-tiles-to-the-app-lau

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    As an example of my comment below regarding initial -- but not permanent -- customization by tenant, see this request:

    https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/264636-general/suggestions/13875528-control-default-tiles-in-app-launcher

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Agreed. I understand starting with a default set of supposedly 'most used/wanted', but the user should have final say over which ones they do or don't use. At the very least, this option should be something each tenant should have the right to implement or not. Some tenants may want certain items required, particularly for custom apps, but allow users to choose the rest.

    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 
  13. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    Totally agree. This is the core problem for my users.

    There's a related suggestion linked below, but the above suggestion's seemingly simple Outlook 2016 fix would eliminate the problem for us (and presumably any other environments split between the online and local clients).

    - https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/286611-office-365-groups/suggestions/9532698-allow-calendar-appointments-to-be-created-without?page=2&per_page=20

    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 
  14. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Microsoft 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 
  15. 59 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    For what it's worth, the following suggestion is a duplicate of this. Can an admin please merge?

    https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/264636-general/suggestions/8384520-allow-users-to-choose-whether-characters-are-autom

    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 
  16. 206 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bill Blais commented  · 

    For what it's worth, the following suggestion is a duplicate of this. Can an admin please merge?

    https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/264636-general/suggestions/10366713-please-add-an-option-to-turn-off-automatic-emotico

    Bill Blais supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base