Feedback by UserVoice

Scott Moore

My feedback

  1. 512 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thank you for taking the time to submit this feedback. Since there are multiple pieces and layers of feedback in this single post, it makes it more difficult than many to address. First, let us share a little about what we’ve been doing. Since this post was made, we have prioritized performance and reliability improvements for both Message Trace (inside 7 days) and Historical Search (typically outside of 7 days). We’ve added details to Message Trace that weren’t there before, decreasing the need to run Historical Searches inside of 7 days. For Historical Search, we have improved the results to be more clear for those who are not familiar with the Exchange Message Tracking log format. Additionally, while we get the total value of Message Trace, we’ve also prioritized reducing the constant need to search & destroy. We’ve made tremendous strides in effectiveness, even as the bad guys got more…

    Scott Moore commented  · 

    Looks like Subject based searches has been added to SCC\Threat Management\Explorer, but this requires E5 licensing. As I noted over a year ago, this should be a fundamental functionality of Message Trace and should not require elevated licensing in order perform this action. Whether it is added to the Message Trace in EAC or the Explorer in SCC is available to all O365 customers regardless of licensing, that doesn't matter, just the basic ability to search by subject is what matters.

    Also, I have to agree with other here that >7 day old search performance is in no way improved. This takes FAR too long.

    Scott Moore supported this idea  · 
    Scott Moore commented  · 

    The ability to perform message traces in the EAC GUI by Subject as John noted is a fundamental requirement. Also, the ability to search by sender domain in the GUI should be a fundamental requirement.

  2. 1,522 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Scott Moore commented  · 

    We need the ability to send to MORE than 500 recipients. Not because we need to be able to select the entire GAL and send a message (we actually have a dynamic and controlled DL for company-wide communications), but rather for 3rd party reasons. What I mean is let's say we have an application with 5,000 people accessing it. We need to send a message to those 5,000 people. The list of users is dynamic so creating a DL, even a dynamic DL, is not feasible since the application isn't AD or O365 integrated (say, SAP for example). So I need to export the list of users to send them a message, but I cannot send 1 message. Instead I have to split it up into 10 messages with 500 recipients each. If this was 1 application, I could say we could manage, but when you are in an enterprise environment and you have hundreds of apps servings tens of thousands of users where creating DLs is not an option, this 500 recipient limit is a real hindrance on basic day-to-day activities, especially for the non-technical people that make up 90%+ of the user community. To boot, its not exactly easy to manage DLs with nothing more than a list of email addresses that you will get from the applications, even trying with standard (non-dynamic) DLs isn't an option.

    Scott Moore supported this idea  · 
  3. 210 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Scott Moore supported this idea  · 
  4. 68 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Scott Moore supported this idea  · 
  5. 30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance » Reports  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Moore supported this idea  · 
  6. 79 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Scott Moore supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base