Feedback by UserVoice

SjoerdV

My feedback

  1. 304 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  2. 132 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  3. 216 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    You can actually achieve this already with Azure AD Conditional Access App Control (Block Downloads setting) which will make use of Cloud App Security.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/conditional-access/controls#session-controls
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/cloud-app-security/proxy-intro-aad#supported-apps-and-clients

  4. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Indeed we need these limits raised please. Today everything is a Group or a Site Collection of its own. Nested sites are not recommended as well, so please make these limits more practical.

    On a side note, I am quickly running out of votes here as Microsoft insists on adding stuff nobody asked for but fails to fix stuff that is desperately needed. Please listen to your communicty or disband the site altogether.

  5. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    With us the OneDrive thing worked, but some Groups gave this error (but not all groups, btw)

  6. 79 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    This is very much needed, I have many customers with over 1000 projects and each should be assigned (or excluded) to a different retention policy scheme. This limit needs to be increased asap, as the current limit is simply not realistic. Also the Site Collection entity is the new standard for years now (de-emphasizing enormous sub site structures in one SC), so limits on these entities should be increased as well.

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  7. 386 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    'By Design'... indeed. Please change this to the intuitive and logical way of interpreting this column.

  8. 71 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » SharePoint Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,020 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    65 comments  ·  Delve  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    This is really getting rediculous, 2.5 years and no action on this... Foreign Principles, Cloud Meeting Rooms, all kinds of 'users', which are no users at all. It kind of bugs me that a corporate directory has 'by default' so much waste.

  10. 270 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    30 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  11. 643 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin » SharePoint Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    There is a difference between disabling and hiding the buttons. I have configurered a couple of flows on a list that are being triggered by buttons through 'column formatting', they should keep working of course so disabling flow alltogether on the site is not an option, but I would like the abilitiy to start these flows from the command bar to be removed for obvious reasons.

  12. 563 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    41 comments  ·  Office 365 Security & Compliance » eDiscovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Why must user experiece always be impacted when enabling a seemingly background process like a retention policy... please fix asap

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  13. 80 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    We have a lot of false positives on the default postmaster address as a sender, which does not have mailbox. mails containing Undeliverable and X-Microsoft-Antispam-Untrusted are being seen as a DLP policy hit on the default GDPR rules ... there are really far to much false positives and no tools to filter those out. Kind of a sucky experience.

    In general I find the 'wizard system' to be poorly designed, they require far to much clicking and waiting. Overall I am not fond of Security and Compliance Centers, where is the responsiveness, where is the speed??? It's like going back 10 year

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  14. 90 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Office 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 510 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  16. 184 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Office 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Office 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Please fix this to a realistic limit

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  18. 895 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    31 comments  ·  Delve » People Experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  19. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  20. 736 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  General » Users, Photos, Contacts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base