Feedback by UserVoice

RikH

My feedback

  1. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    RikH shared this idea  · 
  2. 105 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH supported this idea  · 
  3. 508 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH commented  · 

    We're still using the EDU E3 plan for licensing. Is Bookings going to be made live on E3? Or, are we going to have to wait until the E3 licenses are replaced by A3 licenses?

    RikH supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,164 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,121 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Office 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH commented  · 

    Absolutely, although using a naming convention for Groups is useful in the Global Address List, the Group Name should not necessarily be set the same as the Group Site name.
    We should have the ability to rename the Site name and URL independently of the Office 365 Group name which appears in the Global Address List.

    RikH supported this idea  · 
  6. 1,653 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  Office 365 Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH supported this idea  · 
  7. 187 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH supported this idea  · 
  8. 2,745 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    55 comments  ·  Office 365 Admin  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH supported this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  M365 (Microsoft 365) Admin Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH shared this idea  · 
  10. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  M365 (Microsoft 365) Admin Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH supported this idea  · 
  11. 154 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  M365 (Microsoft 365) Admin Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    RikH supported this idea  · 
  12. 712 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thank you for your feedback. We have a clarifying question that would help us to prioritize this better: If you need notices 3 (or more) times per day, why use quarantine at all? Why not send the mails to a junk folder which the user can check on demand? If you want a notice each time any message gets quarantined, again, what prevents just sending the mails to a junk folder instead?

    RikH supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base