Ability to apply multiple Branding Options for Office 365 Message Encryption
Office 365 Message Encryption currently only provides the ability to specify one set of branding configurations (see https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn569292.aspx). Large enterprises that have multiple entities need the ability to provide branding for each entity.
For example, if Contoso was comprised of entities Fabrikam, Northwind, and ADatum, each entity should be able to specify it's own branding for OME.
Josh Hampton commented
I know this is an old thread but this is possible, there just isnt any information on how to do it now. If someone needs a write up let me know and I will post one.
This is a very critical need, however one mitigation would be use an umbrella "brand". For example, let's say Contoso is the parent/umbrella company of Fabrikam, Northwind and ADatum - the "brand" could be something like "Encryption Services provided for the Contoso family of companies: Contoso, Fabrikam, Northwind and ADatum."
Rob Traynere commented
Should have a New-OMEConfiguration cmdlet (get/set already can "target" by identity, even though there is only one identity)
Also need the ability to scope out which configuration to apply in mail flow/transport rules.
OMEv2 and IRM provide really great additional functionality and control over messages / attachment - as compared to Office Message Encryption
However there is some confusion with the different experiences (inline / branded portal) with recipients.
To force the banding and having additional templtes, would be a very helpful feature and possibility create a more consistent / personalized recipient experience.
In order to prevent legal issues, it is an imperative for our company to provide branding for our multiple email domains(aka subsidiary) for our one tenant.
This is an absolute necessity. There are so many companies that own multiple entities which each require separate branding. Office 365 easily handles mail routing for multiple domain names. However, is it the expectation from Microsoft that to separate branding for companies, we need to setup different O365 tenants to handle the different branding? Also, there should be more ability for the branding. Recipients of email are paranoid to open these emails because of all the scams out there. There needs to be more options and flexibility to brand the content to a level that the recipient would trust the content to open it. Kudos to Microsoft on the enhancements from to OME v2 from v1. OME v1 and the concept of downloading the msg and opening it, created lots of raised eyebrows to trust the content.
100% agree with this suggestion!!!!