Feedback by UserVoice

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP)

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Include offending messages in alerts for "Suspicious email sending patterns detected" policy

    When I receive an alert of the policies like "Suspicious email sending patterns detected", I would like to see some information about the messages that have triggered the alert. Subject line would be nice. Without this I cannot have discussions with the sender to correct the problem.

    44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Exchange Online auto-labeling can label emails at rest

    Need a way for scanning email at-rest for identifying GDPR and similar data compliance requirements. today only DLP while in transit is available to identify sensitive email content due to lacking index of this data.

    22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  2 comments  ·  Auto-labeling for data at rest  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Ability to Disable or Exclude specific Built-in sensitive info types in content discovery

    Hundreds of Thousands of our documents are being incorrectly classified/identified by Sensitive Info Types as being INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES (ICD-9/10-CM).

    Having raised MS Ticket 19009613, they advised I use this UserVoice to determine how we might:


    1. Ensure that data that includes the word 'worries' isn't classified as above, or

    2. have the ability to deselect or disable this Built-In sensitivity type

    We were offered the idea of creating our own customised rules but we enjoy the default nature of scanning etc and don't wish to maintain own own classifications/labels.

    Thanks

    Phil

    9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. Allow document revocation from PowerShell and SDK

    It would be beneficial to be able to programmatically revoke access to protected content for a specific entitlement or for all entitlements.

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Remove "People with the link" link type on a tenant level

    Currently, removing the "People with the link" sharing option is only possible per site:
    Set-SPOSite -DisableCompanyWideSharingLinks Disabled -Identity $siteUrl

    Considering that the recommendation from Microsoft is to allow all FTEs to create O365 Groups (therefore, SPO sites), disabling this link on every new site would require automation (adds complexity, costs) and would be done with delay.

    Our Chief Security Officer sees it as a security threat, and to limit accidental exposure, requested this sharing link to be disabled on a tenant level (with an option to enable it per site).

    The following would be very useful:
    Set-SPOTenant -DisableCompanyWideSharingLinks

    6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. Free text field so that we can write our own messages on the warn, justify, or block pop-up messages for specific labels

    AIP is a good product but the customer messaging on functionality such as the "Confirmation Required" to warn, justify, or block pop-up messages for specific labels is too limited. cannot this be a free text field so that we can write our own messages?

    6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Make the Get-LabelPolicy command DistributionStatus and DistributionResults properties accurate and meaningful.

    Currently the DistributionStatus always seems to have a value of Pending and the DistributionResults is empty. It would be useful for the results to accurately represent the status confirming distribution across all SC&C infrastructure and SPO if the tenant has enabled AIP integration and any other integrations. This is a compliment to UserVoice it https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/928576-microsoft-information-protection-mip/suggestions/40866619-mip-publishing-sensitivity-labels-takes-24-hours

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  1 comment  ·  Administration and Admin Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Label changes from the desktop application are not reflected in the "Confidentiality" column in SharePoint Online.

    With the new preview version of confidentiality labels for Office files in SharePoint and OneDrive, users can implement confidentiality labels from Office desktop applications, however, these changes are not being reflected in the "Confidentiality" column. "in SharePoint Online.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base