Feedback by UserVoice

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP)

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. No need to show label dialog if user not interested in saving newly created document

    If I open a new document e.g. excel type something to it and close it without save, Microsoft Azure Information Protection Dialog is displayed forcing user to label it.

    Steps:
    1. Open Excel
    2. Type something inside excel
    3. Click Save
    4. Label dialog appears, click Not Now
    5. File save dialog appears - click cancel
    6. Try to close document
    6. Label dialog appears again, click cancel with no file save dialog

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sensitivity labels in Office applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Block upload to SharePoint due to sensitivity label mismatch

    An auditable event is created when a file with a higher classification is created on a lower classification site, and an email is sent to the user to notify them of the mismatch. It is also possible to create a DLP policy to block access to a file by all but the user who uploaded it and site owner when a labeled file is uploaded to certain sites.

    The issue is that in both actions, it still allows the file to successfully be stored in the site, and person who violated the policy still retains access to the file in…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sensitivity labels in containers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Footers being applied to several policies

    On other classification technologies I have been able to apply or not apply footers to certain policies or groups but keep the same labels. With AIP, you are limited once you create a label to stick with the footer function if you want to use it all policies making it difficult to distribute to other use cases policies. This makes it difficult to keep consistency across the organization with base labels. I am now having to create sub labels called no footers to ensure they don't get the added footer which causes more confusion.

    I recommend Microsoft come up with…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Include information on document accessed in RMS log

    When a protected document is accessed it is logged in the log analytics workspace and the workload for the record is RMS. The operation is "AcquireLicense." However, it only contains data regarding the protection owner, user who attempted to access, and the label. There is nothing that can identify what document was accessed. There is no data in this record that is unique to the file accessed that can be correlated against other records to identify the file.

    Please include something to identify the file.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Ability to Duplicate a policy

    It would nice to have the ability to duplicate a policy when the configurations are the same for another policy. This would be a quicker way to create multiple policies with the same configuration but the ability to change the policies names would also need to be enabled. Changing the policy names is another suggested enhancement.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Ability to Change Policy Names

    Sometimes we may need to only change a policy name in DLP without recreating the whole policy simply because the naming convention needs to be updated. Suggestion is to add a feature to change a policy name without recreation.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Make visual markings visible in email message before hitting Send

    Currently visual markings are not displayed to the author/sender of an email until after it's sent. Until it is sent and accessible in the Sent folder, the sender may be unware of the content of the visual marking. By seeing the visual marking, the sender can confirm that the appropriate label has been selected or select another more appropriate one.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sensitivity labels in Office applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Enumerate through all email addresses in Distribution List to identify and enable outlook block/warn/justify email flow rules

    Currently if a non-trusted email domain is embedded within Distribution List, Outlook email flow does not identify and hence does not apply appropriate policies set.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Increase release speed of endpoint data loss prevention

    I am seeing the ability to enable sensitivity labels at the sharepoint, teams and 365 endpoint, but it is still in preview. Please release this to us ASAP.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/sensitivity-
    labels-sharepoint-onedrive-files?view=o365-worldwide4

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Ppdf súbor sa zobrazí len po stranu 50

    Ppdf súbor sa zobrazí len po stranu 50. Ostatnésyrany sa nezobrazia.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Outlook oversharing popups in AIP Client should support DL expansion

    When configuring exempt domains from pop-up messages for labels, any emails within a distribution list (DL) are not checked as the DL is not expanded. This means that if we want to popup and perform an action anytime an external domain is included will not occur if an external domain is within a DL.

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    thinking about it  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Screensharing of Azure RMS protected files on Teams.

    Team members see a black screen if we try to show an Azure RMS protected file.
    Please add the permission to share screen of Azure RMS protected file on Teams.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Rights Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Enable logging in the OME webportal

    It would be helpfull if we can log when and how people get their OME protected mails if they use the webportal.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Mail auto-labeling should inspect the mail subject

    E-mails that contain sensitive info types in the subject line should be scanned and prompted for auto-classification (recommended or automatic).

    We have identified a use case in our org around sensitive data in e-mails with a ticket number in the subject line and would like to allow the recommended auto-classification to scan/detect part or all of an info type in the subject line.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Provide for multiline headers and footers for unified label

    Provide multiple lines for text in content marking headers and footers in UL which were previously available in the classic Azure Information Protection label content markings. Alternatively allow special format characters such as new line in the text or better still support HTML5.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  16. Support standalone "Custom Permissions" action with Sensitivity Labels

    To keep the classification and protection separated. i.e. user is able to manually select the "Custom Permission" option from Word, Excel and PowerPoint to do the protection of files; to be able to activate the "Custom Permission" popup box from the menu to allow flexibility of protecting files.

    For your considerations, please. Thank you.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Visual markings: allow custom markings to override MIP-set markings on per-document basis

    Visual markings: allow custom markings to override MIP-set markings on per-document basis

    Use a document property (or equivalent) that can be set in a document or doc-template (.dotx, etc) to block the label-defined visual markings (normally set by MIP) and which allows the user or the organization to set their own customized visual markings via e.g. "docProperty" field in the document; (this behaviour should be configurable to be blocked via GPO/Regkey/Intune, in case an organization doesn't want to allow marking-override by end-users).

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  18. Endpoint DLP should support enforcement based on file extensions

    Please road map USB restriction based on file extension in endpoint DLP (in preview now))

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Change the wording on AIP outlook warning pop-up

    Current outlook warning pop-up says " You are about to send content classified as "classification" to on one or more untrusted Recipient."

    Can the wording be changed from the techy/abrasive mention of 'untrusted recipient' to referring to it as an 'external recipient' or 'outside of your organisation'

    13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Allow end-user to control content marking location

    Currently, in AIP label classification, these settings are static (i.e. left or right etc.). The reason for this use case is that, when PowerPoint sides are created, the static label header and footer causes a problem, sometimes they overlaps the actual PPTX contents and this makes the presentation look bad to the audiences.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

← Previous 1 3 4 5 34 35
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base