Feedback by UserVoice

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP)

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Digital signature in Adobe Sign-in of protected Microsoft files

    Currently it is not possible to create a digital signature on a Microsoft file that is protected. In order to sign a document in Adobe sign, the protection needs to be removed before creating the digital signature. After the digital signature is made, it is not possible to protect the PDF with a Sensitivity label. The solution should be that it is possible to digitally sign a protected file and/or protect a PDF that is digitally signed with Adobe sign.

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Change the wording on AIP outlook warning pop-up

    Current outlook warning pop-up says " You are about to send content classified as "classification" to on one or more untrusted Recipient."

    Can the wording be changed from the techy/abrasive mention of 'untrusted recipient' to referring to it as an 'external recipient' or 'outside of your organisation'

    15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Ability for admins to get notified once labels are published across all platforms

    When Sensitivity labels are published – there is nothing to “close the loop” on the feedback other than rechecking & testing periodically.

    This is a terrible way to run things (nearly as bad as having to wait 24 hours?) if it’s going to continually be like this… surely it makes more sense to be alerted via email once the task is complete or failed?

    Ideally can we get some automated feedback like an email notification of when the Labels have been completed?

    This should also come back with an error if you have done something incorrect and the result is…

    21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. Add the label color to the sensitivity label drop down for built-in-labeling

    One major advantage of the AIP unified client is that it provides the visibility of the color of the label when selecting via hover and once selected in the bar. This makes it very easy to know what label is selected. If this color could be incorporated into the built-in-labeling UI there would be 1 less need to have the client installed and it would provide a clearer separation of labels.

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  5. Allow reclassification of manually labelled files in MCAS

    Allow reclassification of manually labelled files via AIP/Unified Labels on SPO/OD4 via MCAS File Policies. Currently only files previously labelled by MCAS can be reclassified by MCAS.

    53 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. Allow Word MailMerge to email to select a sensitivity Label

    When mandatory labeling without a default is enabled ( to force users to think about what label to apply) mail merge from Word to outlook prompts on all merges. A 400 contact mail merge therefore requires 400 emails to be classified rather than applying a label from Word. we need a way to allow mail merge to select the email classification

    22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. Store data in Region only Label Option

    For a lot of regulations it´s important that files and documents are only stored in a Region like Germany or Switzerland. We need the option to have a label, which is connected to a region.

    For Example:
    Secure Label (offline 4 days, encryption by double key, only executive board, -> only stored in Germany)

    12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. Fix Issues with opening encrypted content from external organizations using Conditional Access

    If an external organization sends you an encrypted email or file but is also restricting remote access by either requiring multi-factor authentication for guest users then the recipient cannot open the file or email. The recipient receive an error notification in the Outlook Desktop App that contains the codes CAA20004 and AADSTS90072 containing the text “The account needs to be added as an external user in the tenant first. Sign out and sign in again with a different Azure Active Directory user account”.

    This problem also occurs if there are conditional access rules blocking remote/guest users from accessing AIP.

    This…

    22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. Allow only users of a security group to create sharepoint sites

    It would be good if you can configure the permissions for the creation of sites in sharepoint, and only those that are within a specific group can do so

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Administration and Admin Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Specify outlook-specific default sensitivity label

    Dear Admins! - Please read this fully before marking this as "Done"!

    Requirements:
    We would like the ability to set a default label for all documents, but exclude email/outlook from the policy.
    Currently there is a powershell setting 'OutlookDefaultLabel' however it is not an adequate/complete solution given that:
    1. it requires the unified labeling client to be installed on endpoints
    2. it does not work for outlook clients that have native support for sensitivity labels (O365 Pro plus, the outlook web client, or for outlook mobile apps)

    Background:
    We are trying to deploy sensitivity labels to our company wherein all…

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  11. Revoke access without waiting for the offline policy expiry

    In the latest AIP UL client (preview), it's possible to revoke access on a protected document. But if offline access is allowed, users will continue to be able to access the documents that have been revoked until the offline policy period expires.
    I would be more convenient that revoking applies directly for users trying to open a copy while ONLINE.
    The current behavior may force us to remove offline access (or reduce dramatically the period) on labels of great sensitivity. Still our end-users, especially top managers would need such offline mode

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Auto-labeling for data at rest  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. SharePoint Online | PnP | Allow apply Sensitivity Labeling programmatic way | unattended

    Hello,
    At this moment Sensitivity Label can be applied only using Set-SPOSite;
    And there is no unattended way to connect to the SharePoint Online: Connect-SPOService;
    The PnP can be connected using a certificate as an example, but PnP doesn't support Sensitivity Labeling;
    So the General Availablity of the Sensitivity Labeling for Sites is great, but please allow to work with it using:
    1. programmatic way
    2. run scripts unattended, no username/password

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sensitivity labels in containers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Integrate AIP Client natively into the Windows OS for classification of non-office file types

    Analysing the types of files that our users share has shown that about 50% are non-Office file formats. Therefore we must currently manage the AIP Unified Labeling client across our fleet and attempt to keep it current. It would be highly preferable to have this functionality native to the Windows OS so that non-office file types can easily have sensitivity labels applied on going without the need to manage a separate client.

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Allow custom branding to work with email that passthrough external DLP system in transport rule

    Allow custom branding to work encrypt email that has first passed through external DLP system with update to email header marked for encryption with OME and add custom branding template to email.
    Currently it does not seem like custom branding is working with emails that have been updated by external DLP that has updated the header.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  OME  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Owner information for MAC users

    Right now MAC does not have an easy option to check the owners information with Native experience and this is once of the most demanded ask by our users.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. App specific visual markings in Built-in labels and Unified Labeling client

    Add the ability to set different visual markings for Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook in AIP Unified Labeling client, as described here for AIP Classic client: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/information-protection/configure-policy-markings#setting-different-visual-markings-for-word-excel-powerpoint-and-outlook

    63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  18. Outlook oversharing popups in AIP Client should support DL expansion

    When configuring exempt domains from pop-up messages for labels, any emails within a distribution list (DL) are not checked as the DL is not expanded. This means that if we want to popup and perform an action anytime an external domain is included will not occur if an external domain is within a DL.

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    thinking about it  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Include information on document accessed in RMS log

    When a protected document is accessed it is logged in the log analytics workspace and the workload for the record is RMS. The operation is "AcquireLicense." However, it only contains data regarding the protection owner, user who attempted to access, and the label. There is nothing that can identify what document was accessed. There is no data in this record that is unique to the file accessed that can be correlated against other records to identify the file.

    Please include something to identify the file.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Allow Label Policy Priority to be set using PowerShell

    We can see the priority levels of different label policies in PowerShell, however in order for me to be able to change it I have to log into the UI. Can we extend the functionality for me to be able to save a priority change through script?

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Administration and Admin Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 36 37
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base