Feedback by UserVoice

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP)

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Allow reclassification of manually labelled files in MCAS

    Allow reclassification of manually labelled files via AIP/Unified Labels on SPO/OD4 via MCAS File Policies. Currently only files previously labelled by MCAS can be reclassified by MCAS.

    44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. App specific visual markings in Built-in labels and Unified Labeling client

    Add the ability to set different visual markings for Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook in AIP Unified Labeling client, as described here for AIP Classic client: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/information-protection/configure-policy-markings#setting-different-visual-markings-for-word-excel-powerpoint-and-outlook

    58 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. Allow for information protection to be applied from multiple tenants.

    As a consultant who is frequently given a user account and login for collaboration in a client's tenant, we need to ensure that both our own company data and also the client data is secured. My laptop is enrolled in our organisation's MAM and MDM policies, which works fine, however logging into office applications with a second corporate login allows me to synchronise all files I am given access to, with no protection applied by the client's MAM policies.

    I am told this is by design that the second account's policies are not applied, however if these can not be…

    6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Labeling Admin Audit Log

    Right now you cannot search for administrative Event regarding Unified Labeling in Office 365 Admn portal Audit Log Search.

    86 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed  ·  6 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Add tracking and revocation with for content protected with Sensitivity Labels

    We need both tracking and revoking function on built-in labels, like on classic client.
    <Use Cases>
    - Users can prohibit viewing when people other than target person/people view the document.
    - Users can revoke the document when they mis-send it to wrong person/people.
    - Users can revoke the document when they send wrong file.

    13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Support for UL "Label Advanced Settings" and "Label Policy Settings" in across supported platforms

    Currently only the windows UL client supports these settings. This means that something as simple as a different default label for Outlook is only available in Windows. Please implement this ASAP as it is the main reason why UL is not ready for production environments, since a different label for Outlook (among other settings) is essential for end-users.

    19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. Classification bar should be available in the Windows Office 365 built in integration with sensitivity labels

    Like with the AIP add-in which have a classification bar in addition to the labels under the "Sensitivity" button. The request is that as part of the built in integration with the Windows Office 365 apps for sensitivity labeling, the bar will be available as well

    51 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. Support for disconnected environments Unified Labeling and built-in sensitivity labels

    In special customer scenarios, systems might be completely disconnected and not have direct or indirect access to the cloud service. This is supported in the AIP Classic client. We need an option to distribute the policy manually in the disconnected environment and for protection we need HYOK integration. To enhance the experience (compared to the classic client), bootstrapping the client automatically would really help.
    Even if this is some kind of niche scenario, it might be important for many public sector or highly regulated customers.

    23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed  ·  4 comments  ·  Sensitivity labels in Office applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Allow admins to set UDP permissions and enduser add the approved recipents

    Using AIP unified labels it is desired to have restrictions apply to a specific sub label where protection/encryption is enabled/set by the IT backend. The end user whom labels the document must be able to decide who can access the protected document, when the label is applied

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. Policy "Suspicious email sending patterns detected", include sample messages

    When I receive an alert of the policies like "Suspicious email sending patterns detected", I would like to see some information about the messages that have triggered the alert. Subject line would be nice. Without this I cannot have discussions with the sender to correct the problem.

    22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Unified Sensitivity Labels in the Government Cloud (GCC and GCC High)

    Bring Unified Sensitivity Labels into GCC and GCC High.

    10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. Use AI to give recommendation how to classify

    It would be cool to have AI in the Background that learns from already classified Documents of one Department or Businessline how critical expressions are related to each other and lead into a certain classification. With this AI-Knowledge the System would be able to recommend or auto-classify new or not yet classified old Files in the right way. This would lead into less manual confiured sensitifity types.
    Focus of this idea should be the improvement of the recommendations in a first step without the need of manual configuration.

    24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  13. Ability to Disable or Exclude specific Built-in sensitive info types in content discovery

    Hundreds of Thousands of our documents are being incorrectly classified/identified by Sensitive Info Types as being INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES (ICD-9/10-CM).

    Having raised MS Ticket 19009613, they advised I use this UserVoice to determine how we might:


    1. Ensure that data that includes the word 'worries' isn't classified as above, or

    2. have the ability to deselect or disable this Built-In sensitivity type

    We were offered the idea of creating our own customised rules but we enjoy the default nature of scanning etc and don't wish to maintain own own classifications/labels.

    Thanks

    Phil

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. Remove "People with the link" link type on a tenant level

    Currently, removing the "People with the link" sharing option is only possible per site:
    Set-SPOSite -DisableCompanyWideSharingLinks Disabled -Identity $siteUrl

    Considering that the recommendation from Microsoft is to allow all FTEs to create O365 Groups (therefore, SPO sites), disabling this link on every new site would require automation (adds complexity, costs) and would be done with delay.

    Our Chief Security Officer sees it as a security threat, and to limit accidental exposure, requested this sharing link to be disabled on a tenant level (with an option to enable it per site).

    The following would be very useful:
    Set-SPOTenant -DisableCompanyWideSharingLinks

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. Prevent Default to "All" users when removing all users from Label Policies.

    When all users or groups are removed from "Label policies" permission scoping, "All" users are selected by default. This should not be the case. If all users/groups are intentionally removed, the permissions scope should be 'none' rather than 'all' users.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Show who applied the sensitivity label and when

    If a document/email has been classified/labeled using the AIP Classic client, the AIP Classic client shows the email address of the user who applied that label (when hovering the mouse on it in the Information Protection Bar).

    This feature is not present anymore in Unified Labeling, reportedly "by design".

    It would be useful to have as a configuration option in MSCC the capability to include among the properties of the document/email, also the name / email address of the user who applied at least the last/current classification label, and the date it was applied.

    (Just as a reference, our bespoke…

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. Support Encrypt Only as a label protection policy for emails

    Encrypt Only is available in Outlook as a stand-alone option. In the same way a label can apply Do Not Forward, allow admins to define Encrypt Only as the action applied by a label.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  18. Add an Advanced Setting to enforce 'offline access' option from the Protection Template

    Hello,

    we have two options to set the 'offline access' time:
    - in the protection template of a label
    - via PowerShell

    The more restrictive option is always prioritized.

    I would like to have an Advanced Setting which lets me choose which one to enforce per label.

    For example:
    - Label: Confidential \ All Employees (7 days offline access)
    - Label: Strictly Confidential \ Custom Permissions (0 days offline access)

    When I want to enforce the 0 days offline for custom permissions I need to set them via PowerShell.
    But then these 0 days are also enforced for the 'Confidential…

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Rights Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Teams DLP channel vs chat policies

    At the base level we really need the ability to setup different policies for Teams chats vs channels. Hopefully these options would be granular enough to even specify the number of people who could see a chat or a channel. So a 1:1 chat might have a DLP policy, but a chat with more than 3 people might have a flag for example.

    Or a channel in a Team with less than 10 people would have a flag, but if the chanel is available to more than 10 people then we could have a different policy.

    Having options such as…

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Support additional filetypes for labeled and protected formats in MCASIntegration

    We would like MCAS Integration with labeled and protected documents to support older Office formats (.doc .ppt .xls) as well as .csv and image formats (.jpg, .jpeg, .png) and .txt

    11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 25 26
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base