Feedback by UserVoice

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP)

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Change the wording on AIP outlook warning pop-up

    Current outlook warning pop-up says " You are about to send content classified as "classification" to on one or more untrusted Recipient."

    Can the wording be changed from the techy/abrasive mention of 'untrusted recipient' to referring to it as an 'external recipient' or 'outside of your organisation'

    13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Ability for admins to get notified once labels are published across all platforms

    When Sensitivity labels are published – there is nothing to “close the loop” on the feedback other than rechecking & testing periodically.

    This is a terrible way to run things (nearly as bad as having to wait 24 hours?) if it’s going to continually be like this… surely it makes more sense to be alerted via email once the task is complete or failed?

    Ideally can we get some automated feedback like an email notification of when the Labels have been completed?

    This should also come back with an error if you have done something incorrect and the result is…

    17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. Allow reclassification of manually labelled files in MCAS

    Allow reclassification of manually labelled files via AIP/Unified Labels on SPO/OD4 via MCAS File Policies. Currently only files previously labelled by MCAS can be reclassified by MCAS.

    50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. Allow Word MailMerge to email to select a sensitivity Label

    When mandatory labeling without a default is enabled ( to force users to think about what label to apply) mail merge from Word to outlook prompts on all merges. A 400 contact mail merge therefore requires 400 emails to be classified rather than applying a label from Word. we need a way to allow mail merge to select the email classification

    20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  5. Store data in Region only Label Option

    For a lot of regulations it´s important that files and documents are only stored in a Region like Germany or Switzerland. We need the option to have a label, which is connected to a region.

    For Example:
    Secure Label (offline 4 days, encryption by double key, only executive board, -> only stored in Germany)

    12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. Integrate AIP Client natively into the Windows OS for classification of non-office file types

    Analysing the types of files that our users share has shown that about 50% are non-Office file formats. Therefore we must currently manage the AIP Unified Labeling client across our fleet and attempt to keep it current. It would be highly preferable to have this functionality native to the Windows OS so that non-office file types can easily have sensitivity labels applied on going without the need to manage a separate client.

    8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Fix Issues with opening encrypted content from external organizations using Conditional Access

    If an external organization sends you an encrypted email or file but is also restricting remote access by either requiring multi-factor authentication for guest users then the recipient cannot open the file or email. The recipient receive an error notification in the Outlook Desktop App that contains the codes CAA20004 and AADSTS90072 containing the text “The account needs to be added as an external user in the tenant first. Sign out and sign in again with a different Azure Active Directory user account”.

    This problem also occurs if there are conditional access rules blocking remote/guest users from accessing AIP.

    This…

    17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Auto-labeling for data at rest  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. App specific visual markings in Built-in labels and Unified Labeling client

    Add the ability to set different visual markings for Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook in AIP Unified Labeling client, as described here for AIP Classic client: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/information-protection/configure-policy-markings#setting-different-visual-markings-for-word-excel-powerpoint-and-outlook

    63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. Outlook oversharing popups in AIP Client should support DL expansion

    When configuring exempt domains from pop-up messages for labels, any emails within a distribution list (DL) are not checked as the DL is not expanded. This means that if we want to popup and perform an action anytime an external domain is included will not occur if an external domain is within a DL.

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    thinking about it  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Include information on document accessed in RMS log

    When a protected document is accessed it is logged in the log analytics workspace and the workload for the record is RMS. The operation is "AcquireLicense." However, it only contains data regarding the protection owner, user who attempted to access, and the label. There is nothing that can identify what document was accessed. There is no data in this record that is unique to the file accessed that can be correlated against other records to identify the file.

    Please include something to identify the file.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Remove extra click when sending new emails

    If users send a brand new email within Outlook and forget to select a label, they're forced to select a label. The users must select a label and click send. We would like to see the extra click be removed so that when users select a label, it automatically sends the email.

    The extra click is an extra step which can be removed to increase efficiency. This also helps improve the user experience and adoption of Microsoft AIP.

    9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Display "AccessDenied" activity on AIP Analytics console as well

    Currently, we need to move to Log Analytics Workspace, then run query to see "AccessDenied" activities. To monitor suspicious activities easier, we should be able to see this activity at the same place as other activities. I mean in 'Activity log' page in AIP admin console. Then we will never have to switch window.

    6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Add tracking and revocation with for content protected with Sensitivity Labels

    We need both tracking and revoking function on built-in labels, like on classic client.
    <Use Cases>
    - Users can prohibit viewing when people other than target person/people view the document.
    - Users can revoke the document when they mis-send it to wrong person/people.
    - Users can revoke the document when they send wrong file.

    24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Make the Get-LabelPolicy command DistributionStatus and DistributionResults properties accurate and meaningful.

    Currently the DistributionStatus always seems to have a value of Pending and the DistributionResults is empty. It would be useful for the results to accurately represent the status confirming distribution across all SC&C infrastructure and SPO if the tenant has enabled AIP integration and any other integrations. This is a compliment to UserVoice it https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/928576-microsoft-information-protection-mip/suggestions/40866619-mip-publishing-sensitivity-labels-takes-24-hours

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  1 comment  ·  Administration and Admin Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Visual markings: allow custom markings to override MIP-set markings on per-document basis

    Visual markings: allow custom markings to override MIP-set markings on per-document basis

    Use a document property (or equivalent) that can be set in a document or doc-template (.dotx, etc) to block the label-defined visual markings (normally set by MIP) and which allows the user or the organization to set their own customized visual markings via e.g. "docProperty" field in the document; (this behaviour should be configurable to be blocked via GPO/Regkey/Intune, in case an organization doesn't want to allow marking-override by end-users).

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. Allow label and protection of Stream videos

    Videos that are saved into Stream may contain sensitive content and we need the ability to label and protect these files. Use cases include recordings of meetings that discussed a merger or human resources issue, recordings of tele health meetings etc.

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Include offending messages in alerts for "Suspicious email sending patterns detected" policy

    When I receive an alert of the policies like "Suspicious email sending patterns detected", I would like to see some information about the messages that have triggered the alert. Subject line would be nice. Without this I cannot have discussions with the sender to correct the problem.

    42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Data Loss Prevention (DLP)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Remove the links to AIP and 'Tell me More' at the bottom of a tooltip that appears when hovering over a label in UL client.

    The links simply opens a page in Office Help that does not provide any information about AIP or Sensitivity labels. Consider instead allowing a customer-provided URL or the option of having the policy customerURL appear and able to be opened from here.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  20. Unified Labeling client - change "Help and Feedback" to "Learn More" and function consistently as Online, Mac, etc.

    The link to the custom help page in the UL client should be reached by the same mechanism as the other implementations - with a "Learn More" button. Reached from a secondary window opened by "Help and Feedback" adds confusion and requires additional material and coverage in training.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Information Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 34 35
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base