Please assist me in bringing the issues we are experiencing to the attention of the correct department as we would like to see future improvements on this product as soon as possible.

1. Find function is very limited
No summary of cell locations for matches displayed

2. No Custom Sort Option

3. Vlookup formula loses focus when you lookup between sheets

4. No filtering by cell color

5. No freeze panes option (or at least freeze top row)

6. No cell border options

7. No replace with option (Used alot and urgently needed)

8. Limited print options
Page layout missing
Landscape / Horizonal missing
Page Count?

9. No Text to column option

10. No Remove duplicates

11. No Pivot Table

When comparing this basic functionality to rivals like google I would expect Microsoft to up their game in this area and enable their existing user base with basics first.

Less is more and by saying that I want to emphasize that before Office 365 gets more nice to have Facebook like features that the basics should be of better quality

When I'm developing an Office 365 app, it should be possible to include the suite bar easily in my application's UX. The App for SharePoint model has this with the "chrome control", but no equivalent currently exists for Office 365 apps - and this means I have to roll my own navigation so that users can exit my app and return to other bits of Office 365. What I want is to integrate the suite bar into my apps - so users can use the waffle to get to the "My apps" page, use their pinned shortcut links to move across to other services etc.

This would provide consistent navigation across the Office 365 suite, *including* in custom apps which choose to implement it.

I am an entrepreneur with highly trained employees that need to be able to wear multiple hats with equal importance for each. The shared mailbox model that Microsoft has setup does not enable my employees sufficiently and although advances have been made, these shared mailboxes are second class citizens. I argued with a Microsoft technical representative for a long time and finally got him to admit that they were. The shared mailboxes have incredibly weak mobile support and support for full functionality in Outlook does not come out-of-the-box with automapping and is tricky to configure by disconnecting the mailboxes through powershell. One of the features that causes the most headaches for my employees are signatures. The Microsoft prescribed method to get shared mailboxes in mobile is to make a shared mailbox a shared folder in the main mailbox in the "Outlook Web App" Application in iOS or Android. There is no way to add the shared mailboxes to the full Microsoft Outlook app because of protocol issues. The only way to get full functionality would be to buy another Exchange license that will cost over $50 / year / mailbox / employee. With employees that have 3-4 mailboxes, this is cost prohibitive. Microsoft figured out that with O365 that the need to give people 5 licenses for Office. This works perfectly for our business that does research and has multiple laboratory computers. Why can't they do the same and give me 5 full exchange mailboxes per subscription each with their own signature. If we have to be stuck with the shared mailbox model (which I currently deplore), then they need to be fully functional everywhere and come with full support including signatures, etc. If your technical support staff recognize the short comings, then give me more licenses until you sort it out. I think the $4 / month Exchange license should buy an additional 5 emails if they are needed. For me, that is the correct value for additional mailboxes. I have bought full E4 subscriptions for each of my employees because they are highly paid and need the best IT support and I don't think the number of email boxes should be a limiting factor in the cloud model. For me, this tells me that Microsoft does not yet fully understand small business. Fix the shared mailboxes or give me more licenses, but don't leave me stranded with no solution except paying exhorbant additional costs on top of the most expensive licensing tier!